University Students’ attitude towards Horses improved with participation in an Equine Activity

Image Alex MastAuthor: Haley Preston – 2nd year student
Faculty Mentor: Dr. Christine Skelly
Faculty Mentor: Dr. Karen Waite
Co-author: Gwynn Shelle
Co-author: Tom Guthrie
Co-author:Paula Hitzler

Abstract

The Michigan State University Horse Teaching and Research Center (HTRC) is open to the public every day. In 2022, 865 Michigan State University students took part in classes at the HTRC, representing only a fraction (1.74%) of the 49,696-student population. This study explored how student participation in a horse activity influenced their attitude toward horses. MSU students (n = 115) were recruited for this study using a campus wide poster campaign, Facebook posts, club and class announcements. Students were randomly divided into 3 activity groups: Guided walk primarily taking place on a farm lane with no opportunity to observe horses (n = 37); a self-guided tour of HTRC with the opportunity to both observe and interact with horses (n = 38); and grooming a horse (n = 40). Students completed a pre and post activity survey immediately before and after their 30-min activity. Both surveys included 8 questions regarding attitudes toward horses using a 5-point Likert scale. Five questions were modeled after the Pet Attitude Scale and 3 questions described what students might experience during their activity (do you like observing, caring for, or petting a horse). A repeated-measures ANOVA in SPSS showed that mean horse attitude scores improved significantly between pre and post test overall (F(1, 112) = 39.879, P < 0.005) and there were no differences between activity groups. During registration, student demographics were collected, and students answered questions about their previous horse experience. Most students participating in this study were undergraduates (78.2%, n = 90). Participants represented 14 colleges across campus, with the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources leading student participants at 36.5% (n = 42). Students described their horse experience as either inexperienced (34.8%, n = 40), novice (31.3%, n = 36), intermediate (14.8%, n = 17), experienced (9.6%, n = 11), or advanced (7.0%, n = 8). Most participants (82.6%, n = 95) strongly agreed they would recommend others to visit the HTRC. Participants in the study also planned to participate in a horse activity in the next year (70.4%, n = 81) based on their experience in this study. While it is estimated the HTRC has 30,000 visitors each year, there is not any information as to whether MSU students utilize the farm outside of classes and organized events. These results support the idea that a visit to the campus horse farm can have a positive impact on a student’s attitude toward horses. This can be important as the equine industry investigates opportunities for individuals to engage in more horse-related activities.

Effects of Health Care Workers’ Participation in Equine Assisted Activities on Their Attitude Towards Horses and Future Participation in Horse Activities

  • Author: Alex Mast – 4th year 
  • Faculty Mentor: Christine Skelly – Department of Animal Science, MSU Extension
  • Faculty Mentor: Karen Waite: Department of Animal Science
  • Faculty Mentor: Gwyn Shelle: MSU Extension 
  • Faculty Mentor: Paula Hitzler: Farm Manager: Horse Teaching and Research Center
  • Faculty Mentor: Thomas Guthrie: Jackson County Extension Office

Abstract:

This study explored the influence of participating in an equine assisted activity (EAA) on health care workers’ (HCW) attitude towards horses and their future participation in horse activities. The study, conducted at the Michigan State University Horse Teaching and Research Center (HTRC), randomly divided HCW (n=55) into three groups: Control – walk on farm roads with no EAA (n=17); Low EAA – self-guided tour of the HTRC with opportunity for horse interactions (n=20); and Mid EAA – grooming a horse under supervision (n=18). All HCW completed a pre- and post-survey immediately before and after their activity and received a riding lesson voucher at the end of their session. Pre- and post-survey data were analyzed using the repeated measures one-way ANOVA procedure in SPSS. A repeated-measures ANOVA in SPSS showed that mean horse attitude scores improved significantly between pre- and post-test overall (F(1, 52) = 15.89,?P?< .001), with no differences between groups. HCW were sent a one-year follow-up survey to determine if they used their vouchers and if not, why. The follow-up survey had a 65% return rate (n=34) and showed that only 14.7% (n=5) HCW used their voucher. Forty-seven percent of HCW who did not use their voucher selected lack of time as the primary reason. This study suggests that participating in an activity on a horse farm may improve HCW attitude towards horses regardless of their opportunity for horse interactions. However, lack of time is a prohibiting factor for HCW future participation in horse activities.